The biggest names in the industry are clapping back.President Donald Trump has not been shy about his goal to demonize drag queens and the LGBTQ+ community and ban pornography. Since Project 2025 was first published, it became clear that adult content was on the chopping block, and so far, the new administration hasnt wavered from this goal. On May 8, Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA) which would band porn of any kind at the federal level if passed. Backed by the Heritage Foundation, the architects behind the draconian Christian nationalist policy plan, Project 2025, the bill would redefine obscenity in the broadest possible terms so that everything from explicit adult content to more tame scenes in traditional films could be considered smut, MSNBC reports. Like every Republican who has tried to codify censorship into law, Lee claims the goal of IODA is to protect children. Adult content creators have known that conservatives were planning to threaten their livelihood, even creating a Hands Off My Porn campaign to try and sway young men to vote for former Vice President Kamala Harris. Much like porn stars and creators predicted, Lee and the Trump administration are using Project 2025, which says porn is to blame for the propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, to try to outlaw porn all together. The bill would target the creators and distributors of pornography, paving the way for a nationwide ban and punishing the tech companies that try to continue publishing adult content, ignoring Supreme Court precedent.But what do LGBTQ+ adult performers and content creators think about IODA, the Trump administrations obsession with banning porn, and how it will impact their careers? Keep scrolling to find out!Related: Scott Hoying on his mother's reaction to his coming out: 'It makes me want to cry'Jkab Ethan DaleSee on InstagramPRIDE: The Senate has proposed the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which would prosecute people for sharing or hosting content deemed to be sexually explicit. What do you think about the bill?Jkab Ethan Dale: The bill is completely unnecessaryand very scary. We already have the Miller Test, which is the national standard for determining whether material is legally obscene in the United States. This new bill is a way for the far right to gain more power through vague language, and its further proof that they do not care about the Constitution. Its a direct threat to the First Amendment and will heavily impact marginalized communities. Its also more evidence that Project 2025 is real, and we all need to work together to stop it.Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?With the current administration, anything is possibleso yes, this could absolutely lead to a ban on pornography. The language used to determine what is or isnt obscene in the bill is so vague that it could be interpreted to target LGBTQ+ identities, sexual education, and more. Theyre not even being subtletheyre openly calling it an anti-porn bill. This bill directly aligns with their Project 2025 agenda, which takes an uncompromising stance against all forms of pornography.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?Im a full-time content creator. This could end my current business and completely change my entire life. Im scared. Whether or not the bill passes, weve already seen this administration show open defiance toward the checks and balances within our system. The way they fight and attack is deceptiveand dangerous to our democracy.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?With GOP leaders controlling both the House and the Senate, I do think this bill has a real chance of passingultimately enforcing the most conservative interpretations of speech and morality across the country. Thats why we all need to stay informed and call our local representatives to make it clear that we stand against this infringement on our First Amendment rights to free speech and expression.This is also a powerful reminder of why local elections matterand why we have to keep fighting back.Jordan StarrSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Jordan Starr: This bill is really dangerous for people like me who work in the adult industry. Its part of a bigger effort from some politicians to ban porn and control sexual expression. One of the main backers, Senator Mike Lee, has been trying to push this kind of thing for years, and now, with Trump and his team (especially the folks behind Project 2025) back in the spotlight, theyre feeling more confident to go after us.Legally, theres a difference between porn and obscenity. Porn is protected by the First Amendment. Obscenity isnt. Since the 1970s, courts have used the Miller Test to decide what counts as obscene. Its not perfect, but its helped keep adult content legal. This bill tries to change those rules so that way more porn can be labeled obscene, which could make it illegal.Basically, they want to shut down adult content by changing definitionswithout coming right out and saying were banning porn. Its a sneaky, extreme move that goes against freedom of speech and artistic expression. Its all part of a bigger push to enforce a Christian nationalist agenda.Do you think this bill could eventually lead to a ban on pornography? Its important to understand this bill doesnt say its banning porn directlybecause that would be obviously unconstitutional. But it tries to change what counts as obscene, which could mean that a lot of what we currently call porn could be reclassified and taken down. So while its not a direct ban, it could still have the same effectshutting down content, censoring creators, and scaring platforms and companies into not working with us anymore.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?If this bill passes, it could be the end of my career and the careers of thousands of other performers, creators, and workers in the adult industry. Websites could stop hosting our content. Credit card companies might cut ties with us. Platforms we rely on could shut down. This bill puts everything weve built at serious risk.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?Honestly? Its ridiculous. The people pushing this act like adult films are some big threat, but theyre ignoring the fact that this is a real, legitimate industry with real people making a living. We tell stories. We connect with our audiences. We make art, even if its sexual. Trying to silence us like this is a jokebut its also dangerous.Dom KingSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Dom King: Its a broad and unnecessary bill. Obscenity is subjective, and giving the government power to define it risks censoring content thats fully legal.Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?It could. Adult content is usually the first target when vague laws like this are passed.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?It would directly impact it. This kind of bill puts the work I doand the platforms I useat risk. Its also how a lot of people pay their bills and support themselves and their families.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?It fits with the Project 2025 agendaa push for more control over media. Adult content is just the starting point.Tyler Saint and Ace BannerSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Tyler Saint and Ace Banner: Well, Id love to see their browser history! Clearly, this bill is a simple infringement on free speech. Its gross overreach by the government to regulate our bedrooms. Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?I dont think it will. Its a transparent page from Project 2025 engineered by the Heritage Foundation to reshape American culture, but the implications go far past just pornography. The definition of obscenity already exists with the Miller Test, but this is a clear attempt at an end-around and opens up the definition of obscene to almost anything that is beyond a G rating. Im not sure bros and horny dads want to lose their Game of Thrones! The bill seems to be rebuffed on both sides of the isle so far.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?If it passes, wed have to find a work around. Our studio has already made moves to transfer operations to another country. Our fans platforms are already heavily regulated, but delivered from other countries. Unless they shut down all internet, porn will still get through. The human desire is too strongplus, I like to think we make good shit that people seem to want to watch. Wed find a way. What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?Its blatant pandering to the base. Trump has high marks from people who hate what he hates. Otherwise, its not a popular position and theres no way it passes the smell test in the judiciary.as long as they hold. However, just like abortion and trans issues, theyll keep hacking away. This is just the test case to see how much the public can tolerate. Lee is an expendable member of congress in a reliably red district. If he gets voted out because of it (which he wont), therell be another one behind him to keep trying. They lose nothing for the effort. The fight is just beginning.Tony GeniusSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Tony Genius: This bill demonizes legal consenting adults and tries to shame our work as immoral. This is in clear violation of our freedoms of expression through art and must never pass!Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?I do believe that bills like these are funded by companies with an agenda to control others through religious morality. the more they try, the more they gain support for these legislative agendas. Our freedoms are being stripped from us, and even those who support these actions today, may be the victims of the actions tomorrow. How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?I would be fighting for my freedom because nothing they are presenting will stop me from my expression! What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?We all knew the ties between Trump and Project 2025, and we have been preparing for the actions of this administration to disappoint us all with far reaching government control and censorship.King DwarfSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?King Dwarf: As someone who works in the adult film industry, I see the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA) as a serious threatnot just to my livelihood, but to free expression and the rights of consenting adults across the country. On a personal level, its frightening. This bill seems to criminalize the work I do, even though its legal, consensual, and involves adults choosing to engage with and create sexual content. It treats that work as inherently harmful or dirty, without acknowledging the humanity, agency, or professionalism of those of us in the industry.Do you think this bill could eventually lead to a ban on pornography? Why or why not?I absolutely think the IODA could lead to a ban on pornor at the very least, make it nearly impossible to create, share, or access it legally in the U.S. Even if it doesnt say porn is banned, the way its written gives the government way more power to decide what counts as obscene, without the usual protections weve relied on. Right now, there are rules that help protect what I do as free expressionespecially if it has artistic value, or if it reflects the standards of specific communities. This bill wipes that out and replaces it with a stricter, one-size-fits-all moral definition. Thats terrifying, because once you change the legal standard, its easy to start applying it to all kinds of porn. Suddenly, what I film or posteven if its consensual, legal, and made by adultscould be labeled obscene and criminal. And when that happens, platforms that host our work, payment processors, even social media companies will panic. Theyll kick us off just to be safe. Weve seen it beforeafter SESTA/FOSTA, a lot of sex workers lost access to the internet almost overnight.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?If the IODA passes, it could devastate my livelihood. Right now, I earn a living by creating and distributing adult contentcontent thats legal, consensual, and made for adults who choose to view it. If this bill becomes law, that could all be at risk. Even before the law is enforced, platforms I rely onOnlyFans, JusrFor.Fans,might shut down adult content to avoid liability. Payment processors like Visa and Mastercard might follow, as theyve done before when they feared legal trouble. No platform = no income stream. If the definition of obscene content is broadened and federalized, theres a real chance I could be criminalized just for doing my job. That includes filming, posting, or even sharing behind-the-scenes content. The threat of jail time, fines, or getting caught in a legal fight is chillingnot just for me, but for everyone in this space.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?As someone working in the adult film industry, I find the Trump administration's recent actions deeply concerning. The administration has supported legislation that could criminalize the production and distribution of adult content, such as the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA). Additionally, the administration's backing of initiatives like Project 2025, which includes proposals to ban pornography and prosecute those involved in its production, signals a significant threat to our livelihoods and freedom of expression. These measures not only jeopardize our ability to work safely and legally but also risk pushing the industry underground, where performers may face greater exploitation and fewer protections. It's essential to recognize that adult content is a form of expression and that those involved deserve the same rights and protections as workers in any other industry.Dallas SteeleSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Dallas Steele: This bill isnt surprising. The current administration has emboldened the extreme right to go after everything from abortion to marriage equality to immigrant rights and now, this attack on free speech. The courts have made clear that pornography IS protected by the First Amendment. But even if this were to become law and later, overturned by the Supreme Court, we have no guarantee this administration will follow the order. Look at how many court orders theyve failed to follow already.Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?Republicans love porn too, though most would never admit it publicly. I dont see this bill going anywhere. Theyll say I support the idea, but our Constitution is clear about this. And ultimately, if it did pass, Trump a fan of escorts and by extension porn, would be unlikely to sign it, knowing it would most certainly end-up before the Supreme Court and overturned as unconstitutional.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?Obviously if this were to become law, it would be devastating to a multi-billion dollar industry and the hundreds of thousands of people who make a living with adult content. The second effect, would be the creation of an underground industry, endangering women and children the very people republicans claim they want to protect.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?I dont think Trump personally opposes porn but whats scary is his willingness to cooperate with the extremists in order to gain even more power. Weve seen it multiple times. Hed throw his best friend under the bus to make a buck or bolster his power.AlfonsoSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Alfonso: I think is a sensationalist exercise that goes on theme with the actual administration.Do you think this bill could eventually lead to a ban on pornography? Why or why not?It could if the Senate approves it. I dont think it goes through tho, that would impact the economy of a lot of people and the USA cant really afford affecting the economy even more right now.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?Honestly it would affect me more emotionally as an Artist and a creator than economically, because at the time I couldnt really say that I live just from producing porn. I guess I would have to keep doing my work out of the States, I just dont see me quitting this lifestyle. Porn has been big part of my life for almost 10 years now, way before I started being in front of the camera. Its where my favorite network of people thrives.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?I guess it makes sense. It has always been part of the conservative speech to ban different expressions of art. The thing with porn is that its an easy target because it shares a thin line with sex work. Nothing wrong with it, but theres people that just cant stand liberal arts or sex work. They care too much and they really think theyre doing the right thing by banning stuff instead of debating it.BenviPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Benvi: As a sex worker, Im clearly not fond of the proposed bill. It was all laid out in Project 2025 though. Ive just been waiting for this threat to come to fruition much like many others mentioned in Project 2025.Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?I dont think the establishment that currently run our country would abolish a billion dollar industry completely. It may become a lot more restrictive going forward but I have hopes that it wont be completely erased. Because ultimately The industry contributes greatly to our economy.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?With everything else the current establishment is getting away with, Im incredibly worried for the future of my peers and I. A nationwide criminalization of porn would lead to so many people losing their entire livelihood, not just models or creators either. Theres so many people involved in the production side of this industry! Its a very scary time for all of us right now.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?I think its incredibly weak of this administration to directly attack not only the porn industry but every single marginalized community in our country. My hope is that those who feel they havent yet been targeted, realize this and stand by our side before its too late. Also, the Bible Belt consumes more pornography than the rest of the country so Im really hoping that will be taken into consideration when they take it to the polls.Jaq QuicksilverSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Jaq Quicksilver: Somewhere online I found this image two men have protest signs that say "decent men protect indecent movies." I don't know the origins of this photo, but they were damn right. A discerning citizen can see that IODA is not just an attack on pornography but an attack on the right to think and to speak to each other.Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?The proposed IODA is an attack on one of the basic rights of citizens of the United States. I do believe that one of its intended uses is an attempt to outright ban pornography, because it's straight out of the Project 2025 playbook. The writers and proponents of Project 2025 have outright stated one of their goals is to outlaw the creation and consumption of "obscene" media, from pornography to basic medical information for LGBT people.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?The passage of this act would severely jeopardize my livelihood and my ability to support myself. Over 50% - maybe even up to 90% - of my income is from sales in the United States. Consumers are already measurably put off by state-level ID-requirement laws, preferring to go to less ethical websites from abroad, which don't require identification from consumers OR producers. I cannot imagine this would get better if the federal government decided to throttle access or even collect private information from porn consumers. My hard-earned financial freedom would be in tatters.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films? I think the Trump administration's attacks on adult films are despicable Christifascist power grabs... Not to be too blunt about it! This administration is using everything it can - from more conventional methods like IODA to shock-and-awe waves of Executive Orders - to erode the rights of citizens and to disempower us. They use the smokescreen of "obscenity" to attack transgender people, LGBT rights, women's rights, and the freedom of speech as a whole. Damien KingSee on InstagramPRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Damien King: I think on the surface that the bill is a blatant violation of the First Amendment and a breach of the separation of church and state. I also think that it lays the groundwork for a much broader attack on LGBT+ representation in the media.Do you think IODA amounts to a ban on pornography? Why?I think that that is the ultimate goal of republicans, yes. But I dont think that such a ban is likely, particularly because it is a more fringe idea. But Ive been wrong before, so Im also not being complacent.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?Im very fortunate to have a primary source in a different sector, but it would put a dent in my discretionary spending. I do worry for my friends in the field whose primary source of income is adult films.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?I think that this goes beyond the Trump administration not that hes blameless. I think its rooted in the discomfort with sex thats deeply rooted in conservative ideology. Their goal, at the end of the day, is that sex only leads to procreation. Any sex or portrayal of sex be it gay/lesbian or even straight but utilizing contraception - that is purely for enjoyment and not for procreation is under threat from them. As much as we,LGBT+ people will be the first to be attacked, we will not be the last.Sam and Ed (producers at AltSHIFT Films)PRIDE: What do you think about the bill?Sam and Ed: We think that this act is the far right trying to make anything they deem obscene prosecutable if its shared. They havent specifically defined what is obscene; its subjective and vague, making it difficult to apply with certainty to any given material; leaving them open to deem anything obscene which offends their version of morals; this could be anything from depictions of same sex relationships or any relationships such as polyamory which are not the nuclear 2.4 family model, kink events, video games with violence, queer comics and obviously all porn - as some examples. We think this bill could allow them to police all free speech and expression, not just in creative industries, but in how lives are lived and shared online.Do you think this bill could eventually lead to a ban on pornography? Why or why not?We think that this is a start to the US trying to ban all porn; already we are seeing big sites such as Pornhub being banned in some states; such as Texas, which is currently more to do with the law instituting age-verification measures; which are also effecting the UK with the Online safety Act." But it feels like these age verification acts, which are being masqueraded as a way to keep children safe online are really the soft launch to something like IODA which will ban all porn.How will this impact your livelihood if it passes?If porn is banned in the US it would affect us as we sell our films to a global market.Its not just the US that is looking at banning porn, the definitions of extreme porn in UK law are also vague and subject to the whims and moral code of the arbiters. We believe ethical porn means paying and treating the performers correctly, not whats depicted on screen. Our livelihoods are already in the balance, and the more we are driven underground, the less space there is for the protection and oversight of sex worker rights.What are your thoughts about how the Trump administration is attacking adult films?Project 2025 which is a far-right wish list for Trumps term, and calls for an outright ban on porn: "Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered."They are not doing this in secret, they are loudly saying they want all porn to be banned. This is definitely an attack on the adult film industry, and the only hope is for people around the world who believe in freedom of speech and expression to call it out and take it seriously. Education will be imperative, so people understand that this will not affect just people producing porn, but those consuming it also.It is a Trojan bill to start policing all of our creative expression, sexuality, and right to live as we choose, and can only lead to more control on our lives.